The Values of Versatility

Pharmacists, Plants, and Place in the French (Post)Colonial World

Exploring the multifaceted roles of French colonial pharmacists as botanists, chemists, ethnographers, and administrators in the transformation of medicinal plant knowledge.

Introduction: The Apothecaries of Empire

In the annals of scientific history, we often imagine rigid boundaries: the researcher in their laboratory, the explorer in the field, the administrator in the government office. Yet the story of French colonial pharmacists shatters these confines, revealing a world where science, empire, and cultural exchange intertwined in complex ways. From the dense forests of French Indochina to the vast territories of French West Africa, these versatile scientists served as botanists, chemists, ethnographers, and administrators—all while wearing the uniform of the French Colonial Medical Corps 2 7 .

This article explores how Franck Guichard, Joseph Kerharo, and their fellow pharmacists became central figures in the transformation of medicinal plant knowledge between the late 19th and mid-20th centuries 2 . They operated within a system often characterized as purely "extractive"—harvesting natural resources and indigenous knowledge for imperial profit. Yet their work frequently overflowed these colonial constraints, developing into genuine scientific partnerships that respected local therapeutic traditions and, in some cases, contributed to emerging postcolonial national identities 2 .

The Colonial Pharmacist: A Man of Many Missions

Beyond the Dispensary

The colonial pharmacist was never merely a compounder of medicines. As the only trained chemist in many colonies, his duties extended far beyond the hospital pharmacy 7 . A single pharmacist might be responsible for an entire colony's medical supplies while simultaneously running biochemical laboratories, conducting water safety tests, overseeing pest control, and even operating weather stations 7 . This extraordinary range of responsibilities required what historians have called a "values of versatility"—the ability to adapt expertise to diverse contexts and challenges 2 .

The training for such multifaceted roles began at the Navy Medical School (École de santé navale) in France, but truly crystallized in the field where these professionals learned to navigate both the complexities of tropical medicine and the intricacies of colonial administration 7 .

From Naval to Colonial Service

The first pharmacists in the colonies were naval pharmacists, as decreed in 1827 7 . In 1890, the establishment of the Colonial Medical Corps formalized their role, with many naval pharmacists selecting colonial service. Their numbers were always small—from just 34 in 1890 to only 135 by 1954—yet their impact was disproportionate to their ranks 7 .

1827-1890

Naval pharmacists serving rotations in colonies

1890-1920

Founding Colonial Medical Corps members

1920-1950

Hospital pharmacists & supply managers

Post-1950

Transition to peacetime roles

Table 1: The Expanding Role of French Colonial Pharmacists
Period Primary Role Additional Responsibilities Notable Figures
1827-1890 Naval pharmacists serving rotations in colonies Basic medical supply management Victor Liotard
1890-1920 Founding Colonial Medical Corps members Scientific missions, plant prospecting Edouard Raoul
1920-1950 Hospital pharmacists & supply managers Biochemistry, hydrology, toxicology, meteorology Franck Guichard, Joseph Kerharo
Post-1950 Transition to peacetime roles Focus on public health infrastructure -

Scientific Practice in the Field: The Work of Guichard and Kerharo

Medicinal Plants Between Colony and Metropole

At the heart of the colonial pharmacist's work was the study of medicinal plants. They engaged in what historians call "bio-prospecting"—searching for biologically active compounds in local flora 2 . This work was not merely academic; it served practical colonial needs for affordable medicines and potential commercial products 2 4 .

Franck Guichard, appointed in 1939 as the first director of the Laboratory for the Study of Indochinese Materia Medica in Hanoi, exemplified this approach 2 . His work involved systematically documenting and testing traditional Vietnamese remedies, bridging the gap between indigenous knowledge and Western scientific frameworks.

Simultaneously, in French West Africa, Joseph Kerharo embarked on similar missions. His 1945 assignment to prospect for medicinal plants in Côte d'Ivoire under the Office of Colonial Scientific Research (ORSC) typified the colonial government's interest in harnessing local therapeutic knowledge 2 .

Between Extraction and Collaboration

The relationship between colonial pharmacists and indigenous knowledge systems defies simple categorization. While operating within an imperial framework that often treated colonies as resource repositories, many pharmacists developed genuine respect for local medical traditions 2 .

In Vietnam, Guichard participated in a colonial project to scientifically rationalize indigenous materia medica. Surprisingly, this initiative responded to demands from both Vietnamese traditional healers and Western-trained Vietnamese pharmacists who sought to legitimize local therapies and assert a distinctly Vietnamese medicine separate from Chinese influences 2 . This reveals the unexpected ways colonial science could be appropriated for emerging nationalist projects.

Similarly, in West Africa, Kerharo's work with medicinal plants acknowledged the sophistication of local healing practices, even as it sought to integrate them into Western scientific paradigms 2 .

A Closer Look: The "Exotic Syphilis" Experiment

Conceptualizing a Colonial Disease

One revealing case study that illustrates the complexities of colonial medicine involves the treatment of syphilis in sub-Saharan Africa during the interwar period (1918-1939) 9 . French physicians observed that syphilis manifested differently in African populations than in Europeans, with more prominent skin symptoms but seemingly fewer severe neurological complications 9 .

This observation led to the construction of a new medical category: "exotic syphilis" or "dermotropic syphilis"—a form of the disease supposedly specific to tropical populations 9 . Prominent dermatologist Édouard Jeanselme, teaching at the Institut de Médecine Coloniale, formally presented this concept in his 1904 "Lectures on Exotic Dermatology" 9 .

Methodology and Implementation

The approach to treating this "exotic syphilis" embodied the contradictions of colonial medicine. Instead of the complete treatment regimens used in France, colonial doctors developed a practice called "blanchiment" (whitening or clearing) 9 . This method involved:

  1. Identifying infected individuals through medical examinations
  2. Administering limited treatments sufficient to clear visible skin lesions
  3. Withholding full-course therapy due to resource constraints and beliefs about the disease's "benign" nature in African populations
  4. Documenting outcomes primarily through visible symptom resolution rather than laboratory cure

This protocol was justified through a medical discourse that framed "exotic syphilis" as a less serious, predominantly dermatological condition rather than the multi-systemic disease recognized in Europe 9 .

Table 2: Comparison of Syphilis Management in France vs. French Africa (Interwar Period)
Aspect Metropolitan France French Sub-Saharan Africa
Disease Conceptualization Systemic, neurological threat "Benign" skin disease ("exotic syphilis")
Primary Concern Neurological damage, hereditary syphilis Visible symptoms, workforce maintenance
Treatment Approach Comprehensive eradication Superficial "blanchiment" (clearing lesions)
Medical Rationale Prevention of long-term complications Economic efficiency, perceived racial differences
Resource Allocation Significant investment Limited, targeted treatments
Results and Consequences

The "blanchiment" approach produced superficially successful results—visible skin lesions cleared, allowing patients to return to work quickly 9 . However, this practice had profound consequences:

  • Incomplete Treatment: Patients remained infected, ensuring continued disease transmission
  • Late-Stage Complications: Many patients developed severe complications years later
  • Public Health Neglect: The approach justified underinvestment in comprehensive syphilis control
  • Scientific Controversy: A minority of doctors criticized the practice as medically and ethically questionable

This case exemplifies how colonial priorities, racial theories, and economic considerations could shape medical practice, sometimes overriding strict scientific evidence 9 .

The Scientist's Toolkit: Research Reagents and Resources

Colonial pharmacists operated with limited resources in challenging environments. Their "toolkit" reflected both their multidisciplinary training and the practical constraints of working in remote tropical locations.

Table 3: Essential Resources for Colonial Pharmacists' Research
Resource Category Specific Examples Function in Research
Field Collection Plant press, specimen jars, field notes Documenting and preserving medicinal plants
Laboratory Equipment Retorts, centrifuges, colorimeters Basic chemical analysis and compound extraction
Pharmaceutical Preparation Kerosene stoves, suppository molds, tablet presses Compounding medications for local use
Reference Materials Pharmacopoeias, botanical texts, indigenous knowledge records Identifying plants and verifying traditional uses
Transport & Storage Shipping crates, kerosene refrigerators, cold rooms Preserving specimens and medications in tropical climate
Botanical Expertise

Identification and classification of medicinal plants from diverse ecosystems

Chemical Analysis

Extraction and testing of active compounds using limited laboratory resources

Ethnographic Documentation

Recording indigenous knowledge and healing practices

Conclusion: A Complex Legacy

The story of French colonial pharmacists reveals the multifaceted nature of scientific practice at the intersection of different knowledge systems, cultural contexts, and political projects. These professionals were simultaneously agents of colonial administration and dedicated scientists whose work often transcended the imperial framework that enabled it 2 7 .

Critiques

Their legacy includes participation in what can rightly be criticized as scientific extraction—harvesting indigenous knowledge and biological resources for colonial interests 2 .

Contributions

Their work preserved valuable therapeutic knowledge, contributed to local healthcare systems, and provided resources for postcolonial national projects seeking to valorize cultural heritage 2 .

Perhaps most importantly, the trajectories of Guichard, Kerharo, and their colleagues remind us that science is never practiced in a vacuum. It is shaped by the political, economic, and cultural contexts in which it emerges, even as it seeks universal truths. The "values of versatility" that defined these colonial pharmacists—their ability to adapt expertise across domains—offers a compelling model for scientific practice that remains relevant in our globally interconnected world today.

As we continue to grapple with questions about cultural ownership of biological knowledge and equitable scientific partnerships, the historical example of these pharmacist-botanist-administrators provides valuable insights into both the pitfalls and possibilities of cross-cultural scientific exchange.

References