The Hidden Diet of an Invader

Tracking Phosphorus and Potassium Through the Life of Johnson Grass

Once cultivated as forage, now reviled as a weed—this botanical paradox holds secrets of nutrient mastery that could reshape agricultural practices.

Introduction: A Grass with Split Personalities

Johnson grass (Sorghum halepense) embodies one of agriculture's greatest contradictions. Introduced to the U.S. in the 1830s as a promising forage crop, this Mediterranean native now infests farmlands across 47 states, costing millions in control efforts 7 . Yet beneath its reputation as an invasive villain lies a sophisticated nutrient management system. Recent studies reveal how phosphorus (P) and potassium (K)—two elements critical for plant metabolism—dynamically shift within its tissues as it matures 2 5 . This article explores why understanding these nutrient pathways could unlock better management strategies and even sustainable uses for this resilient grass.

Historical Context

Introduced in 1830s as forage, now invasive in 47 U.S. states with millions spent on control annually.

Scientific Insight

Sophisticated P/K management system discovered beneath its invasive reputation.

The Dual Identity: Forage Asset or Ecological Threat?

Botanical Resilience

Johnson grass dominates landscapes through biological ingenuity:

  • Deep rhizomes reaching 15 cm into soil profiles efficiently scavenge P and K, even from nutrient-poor layers
  • Rapid regrowth: A single plant produces 200–300 feet of rhizomes yearly, enabling explosive colonization 7
  • Seed adaptability: Seeds germinate from depths up to 15 cm, with 25% of plants emerging even from this challenging layer

Nutritional Value vs. Risks

When harvested early, Johnson grass rivals traditional forages:

  • Crude protein up to 14% at boot stage 1
  • Total digestible nutrients (TDN) reaching 60% 6

However, maturation triggers risks:

  • Prussic acid accumulation under stress (drought/frost), causing cyanide toxicity in livestock 6
  • Nitrate spikes in stems during rapid growth phases 4
Nutritional Benefits
  • High crude protein (14%)
  • 60% total digestible nutrients
  • Valuable early-season forage
Ecological Risks
  • Prussic acid toxicity
  • Nitrate accumulation
  • Invasive growth patterns

Plant Nutrient Dynamics: The P/K Balancing Act

Growth-Stage Shifts

Johnson grass's P and K content fluctuates dramatically across its life cycle (BBCH stages 10–69):

  1. Early vegetative stages: High K uptake (5.31–5.83% dry matter) supports enzyme activation and water regulation
  2. Boot to flowering: P allocation to seeds intensifies, while K concentrates in stems and leaves 1
  3. Dough stage: Nutrient remobilization depletes P in leaves by 30–50% compared to earlier phases 2

Roots as Nutrient Banks

The grass's deep rhizomes act as P/K reservoirs:

  • Mycorrhizal partnerships: Fungi enhance P solubility in exchange for plant sugars, especially in low-P soils 5
  • Drought response: Rhizomes release stored K to maintain osmotic balance during water stress 7
Table 1: Phosphorus and Potassium Allocation Across Plant Parts
Growth Stage P in Leaves (%) K in Stems (%) P in Rhizomes (%)
Early Vegetative 0.39 5.83 0.22
Boot Stage 0.35 5.71 0.28
Flowering 0.31 5.64 0.31
Dough Stage 0.26 5.31 0.33

Source: Adapted from Tóth & Lehoczky (2007) and University of Georgia trials 1

The Georgia Experiment: A Deep Dive into Maturity Effects

Methodology: Tracking Nutrients from Field to Silage

A landmark University of Georgia study dissected how harvest timing affects yield and nutritive value 1 :

  1. Site Design:
    • 16 plots (2.74 m × 4.57 m) divided into four blocks
    • Treatments: Harvested every 3 weeks (3WK), boot (BOOT), flower (FLOWER), or dough stage (DOUGH)
  2. Nutrient Analysis:
    • Botanical composition: Separated Johnsongrass from weeds via quadrat sampling
    • Fermentation: Ensiled samples analyzed for pH, volatile fatty acids
    • Digestibility: In vitro dry matter digestibility (IVDMD) assessed after 48-h incubation

Key Findings

  • Yield vs. Quality Trade-off:
    • Dry matter yield doubled from BOOT to DOUGH stages
    • Crude protein dropped 27% over the same period 1
  • Potassium's Stability: K content remained high (5.3–5.8%) across stages, unlike P, which declined sharply 1
  • Fermentation Quality: BOOT-stage silage had lower pH (<4.2) and higher lactic acid, indicating superior preservation
Table 2: Nutrient Shifts Across Maturity Stages
Parameter Boot Stage Flower Stage Dough Stage
Dry Matter Yield (kg/ha) 2,800 4,200 5,500
Crude Protein (%) 14.1 11.3 10.2
Phosphorus (%) 0.35 0.31 0.26
IVDMD (%) 68.7 61.2 54.8

Source: Adapted from PMC study (2022) 1

Practical Implications: From Toxicity to Forage Innovation

Safe Utilization Strategies

  • Harvest Timing: Cutting at boot stage maximizes P/K retention while minimizing prussic acid risk 1 4
  • Hay Processing: Proper drying reduces cyanide potential by >90%; mixing with alfalfa dilutes nitrates 6
  • Soil Testing: Avoid K fertilization in soils >88 kg K/ha—Johnsongrass thrives without added nutrients 5

Ecological Cost of Removal

  • Nutrient Loss: Eradicating a dense stand exports ~50 kg K/ha, requiring replenishment 5
  • Herbicide Risks: Glyphosate overuse induces resistance; integrated methods (mowing + controlled grazing) are preferable 7
Table 3: Potassium and Phosphorus Removal by Harvest
Component P Removal (kg/ha) K Removal (kg/ha)
Aboveground Biomass 22–28 80–120
Rhizomes (if tilled) 8–12 30–50

Source: Agronomy Journal studies 1 5

The Scientist's Toolkit
Reagent/Equipment Function
Mehlich-1 Extractant Soil P/K solubilization
Kjeldahl Digestion Apparatus Nitrogen/protein quantification
Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometer K+ ion detection
Vanadate-Molybdate Reagent Phosphorus colorimetry
Grazing Sticks (91 cm) Field tiller sampling
Management Recommendations
  • Harvest at boot stage for optimal quality
  • Test soils before K fertilization
  • Use integrated control methods
  • Properly dry hay to reduce toxins
  • Monitor for herbicide resistance

Conclusion: Rethinking the Invader

Johnson grass forces a reckoning with ecological nuance. Its mastery of phosphorus and potassium cycling—shuttling nutrients between roots, stems, and seeds—reveals why eradication often fails. Yet this same efficiency offers clues to sustainable management: harness its growth for early-season forage, disrupt nutrient storage with strategic tillage, and leverage its deep roots for erosion control. Future research should explore P/K-sensing drones for precision harvesting and mycorrhizal inoculants to suppress toxic compound synthesis. As climate resilience grows urgent, this much-maligned grass may yet yield solutions hidden in its nutrient-rich tissues.

In the words of agronomist Chris Marble, "The weeds winning the battles are those best adapted to our mismanagement." Understanding Johnson grass's nutrient strategies is the first step toward smarter coexistence.

References